SLFP led coalitions with Marxist parties have by
tradition opted for interventionist policies rather than
laissez- faire economic policies as the UNP. They believed
in acquisition of ownership, production and distribution.
Nationalisation, imposition of bans by legislation and control
of prices by government regulations were their policies which
they swore by, till the Communist states collapsed and market
economics came to be even by the former Communist empires.
In Sri Lanka, nationalisation and state
intervention, even in our private lives - limitation of the
number of guests at a wedding— proved to be disasters and led to
the ignominious defeat of the Socialist government of the United
Front. When the SLFP led People’s Alliance with Marxist parties
returned in 1996 after 18 years, they did not change from market
economic policies that prevailed. But there appears to be
nostalgia lingering for state intervention and now with the
economic scenario increasingly resembling that of the 1970s, the
socialist itch of state intervention is evident. The call by the
JVP to de- privatise the CWC is one such instance, even though
it has been held up due to the government lacking funds to buy
back the sold shares, is one instance.
With the cost of living sky rocketing and the
government impotent to control it, the first step of price
control has been announced. The government controlled Daily
News, on Friday, announced that the price of bread is to be
controlled soon on the orders of the Minister of Trade and
Consumer Affairs, Mr Jeyaraj Fernandopulle. The stormy petrel of
the SLFP, has announced that he proposed to maintain the price
of bread at Rs 13 for a 450g loaf of bread. Macho moves such as
this- ‘hitting the bakery ‘mudalalies’ who exploit the poor
masses’—- is popular with the radicals amongst us, but quite
often has proved to be disastrous to political parties in power.
The price control of bread in the seventies was
one of those interventionist moves that caused the defeat of the
United Front government. Price controlled bread issued on ration
cards hit not only the rich but also the poor as well in their
breadbasket. The poor quality of bread sold under extremely
unhygienic conditions, quite often, by authorised political
stooges of the government, the long bread queues and shortages
are the nightmares of those who were unfortunate to be in this
country at that time. Price control of essential commodities
have often proved to be disastrous resulting in shortages,
hoarding, adulteration and profiteering, quite contrary to the
objective of providing such commodities at the cheapest possible
price.
Mr. Fernandopulle is expected to hold
discussions with bakery owners on this matter and reaching a
satisfactory solution. It will be in the interests of all
concerned.
The basic issue concerned would be whether the
cost inputs in making a loaf of bread to specified weight and
standards along with a reasonable profit to bakers, would equal
the controlled price. If the cost of producing bread with the
profit considered exceed the controlled price, then Mr.
Fernandopulle will be hitting one and all below the belt right
on the breadbasket. Bakers obviously won’t continue in business
by making losses. Some may want to fold up and others will adopt
ruses such as producing half baked soggy bread which will
measure up to the specified weight but be unpalatable. Sri
Lankans have gone through all this thirty years ago and would
certainly not like a repeat performance.
We can well understand the plight of the
government—fighting a desperate battle to control the rising
cost of living caused by rising prices of commodities in
international markets. But price control is not the answer,
unless of course, unconscionable profits are being made. If
curbing inflation through price control is possible; this world
would be a happier place to live in.
Mr. Fernandopulle is quoted as saying that he
has had discussions with Indian companies to purchase wheat at
concessionary prices. That indeed is a way out. But will Indian
companies provide us wheat below international market prices for
the sheer love of Sri Lankans? While we hope they do, that
unfortunately is not the way in the world of business. Earlier
when the price of oil shot up a pundit suggested that we should
make use of Mr. Jayantha Dhanapala to persuade Arab oil
producers to sell oil at cheaper prices. Mr. Dhanapala, the able
and distinguished diplomat he has been, unfortunately will not
be able to perform the miracle of persuading Arab nations to
sell us oil at prices below par.
Perhaps the only answer is to get the
commodities want on differed payment terms on a government to
government basis. But this means that we will only be adding on
to Sri Lanka’s woes in the immediate future.