There is a move by the National Housing
Development Authority to get the apartment owners in Government
Housing Schemes to form Management Corporations and register
with the Condominium Management Authority to control,
administer, manage and maintain the housing complexes, under the
Common Amenities Board (Amendment) Act No. 24 of 2003.
What does that mean?
Once the Management Corporations are formed and
registered with the Condominium Management Authority, the
apartment owners of government housing complexes will be virtual
tenants under the Condominium Management Authority. That also
amounts to corporatisation and the "owner tenants" of the
government housing complexes will be at the mercy of the
Authority’ Board of Management consisting mostly public
servants, whilst the "corporation" culture that will be brought
"in will result in favoritism and discrimination with the so
called majority decisions being very often be more unfair than
fair."
Government Housing
It is a fact that Government Housing Schemes
were the outcome of the necessity to provide housing to the not
so affluent middle and lower middle income groups. Thus those
who are either owners or tenants of apartments in Government
Housing Schemes do not belong to the affluent section of
society, though a few with high incomes may have bought
apartments latterly. The apartments in government housing
schemes were sold to the tenants under a Rent Purchase Scheme,
and as a result the tenants changed to be owners. The market
economy has still not brought about any substantial improvement
to their economic status. In fact the situation is worse than
what it was. They cannot bear additional expenditure involved in
sustaining Management Corporations, as envisaged.
There are rules and regulations that apply to
tenants/owners of Government Housing Schemes, especially where
Condominium Property (Flats) are concerned. They have been held
in the breach by some and the then Department of National
Housing and the National Housing Authority that succeeded it
failed to implement the rules and regulations, correctly and
impartially.
In all housing complexes, unauthorized
structures have come up and some residents have fortified
themselves using vacant land which they are not entitled to.
Even if something drops down from an upper floor flat, the
fortresses of some are unapproachable. Putting up buildings on
vacant land under state supervision, will go out of control
after corporatisation and the enforcement of the law will go as
kissing by favour. What the NHDA hopes to do is to get the
owners turned tenants to enter into litigation against their
neighbours and bear the costs of litigation in respect of issues
the NHDA created through its inaction.
Condominium Homes
In other countries, Condominium Property Law is
for property developers and new construction of Condominium
Homes. There, internal roadways, playgrounds, distribution of
electricity and water etc. come under the Management Corporation
and as a result, Condominium Homes are expensive. Condominium
Homes are priced taking into account all such expenditure as
well and those who move in or purchase them are those who could
afford that expenditure. Middle and lower income groups will not
go into occupation of such homes, unless affordable. What the
NHDA intends to do under the new Act is to rope in the owners of
30 to 50 years old apartments ‘in government housing schemes to
be tenants under the Condominium Management Authority using
sugar-coated pills.
The people, who bought Government Flats on the
conditions that existed then, are different type of owners. It
is not fair or correct, for them to be governed strictly under
the provisions of the new act. A management corporation will
turn out to be a virtual "white elephant" to apartment owners.
Local and Statutory Bodies
The apartment owners pay rates and taxes to the
local authorities. Hence clearance of garbage, maintaining of
sewerage systems, maintaining roadways, lighting, etc. is the
responsibility of the local body. Providing electricity to the
households is an obligation of the Electricity Board, whilst the
National Water Supply and Drainage Board has to provide water
service to the homes. It is a right the residents need to enjoy.
The apartment owners pay the Electricity Board and the NWS&DB
for such services. The necessity for such services to be
supplied and managed by the Management Corporations is therefore
an unnecessary exercise which is costly to the apartment owners,
in Government Housing Schemes.
The necessity
The issue of forming Management Corporations
came up even before and on making representations to housing
authorities and the minister, the move was shelved.
Representations to the minister and the housing authorities
jointly by the owners/tenants of government housing complexes
will surely bring results in favour of the apartment owners,
this time too.
The apartment owners, even at present maintain
their apartments to the best of their ability whilst the common
areas of the building are maintained jointly, with expenditure
shared. There are a few who may not cooperate but that could be
overcome by consultation, consensus and understanding. There has
to be an organization and machinery towards that end. But not
Management Corporations registered with the Condominium
Management Authority and Gazetted as a Statutory Body.
Upali S. Jayasekera