Elections Commissioner Dayananda Dissanayake has
been advised by Attorney-General (AG) K. C. Kamalasabayson to
retain private counsel to present his case before court in
actions pending relating to the date of the forthcoming
presidential election.
Elections Department sources said that the
Commissioner had received this advice following a meeting with
the AG on Friday.
The Commissioner has been advised to file his
objections to the JHU petition by August 15 as the case has been
listed for hearing on August 22.
The JHU has sought a determination from the
Supreme Court that a presidential election is due this year
while SLFP Secretary Maitripala Sirisena, intervening, has
submitted that the election is due only next year.
A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court is due
to hear these petitions with the Centre for Policy Alternatives
too saying that they would intervene and argue that the Chief
Justice should not sit on this bench as he had administered the
oath taking of the president.
The Attorney-General did not object to leave
being granted by the Supreme Court to hear the JHU petition as
he was of the view that a substantial question of law and a
matter of public importance needed to be resolved by the Supreme
Court.
The president too has made a reference to the
Supreme Court asking an opinion on the date of the presidential
election as she is entitled to do under Article 129.
Dr. Pakiasothy Saravanamuttu said that they were
filing objections as the CJ is the key actor of a series of
events in connection with the case, which was subject of
contention and controversy and, therefore, he should not sit in
judgement.
"Primarily he should not provide any opinion or
be involved in hearing such fundamental rights petition, he
said.
Dr. Rohan Edirisinha said that basically the
Chief Justice had made the mistake of swearing in President
Chandrika Kumaratunga in December, 1999 when the constitutional
position is quite clear that a second term begins in November
2000.
There is also the controversy about the second
term oath taking ceremony. As the CJ is so integrally involved
in the controversy, he should not be associated in any way in
sitting on a bench of the Supreme Court that looks into
constitutional issues Dr. Edrisinha said.