The Army has begun to question the line taken by
the police in their investigations into the assassination of
Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar on Friday August 12, by the
LTTE. They believe that the police are trying to blame them for
the security lapses discovered after the killing.
Sources said the task of guarding the late
minister’s private residence had been entrusted to the
Ministerial Security Division (MSD). The late Minister had, on
February 21, 2001, in a three-page letter, clearly said that
security at his personal residence had to be taken care of by
the MSD. His private residence was at Havelock place then,
thereafter he had informed the police of the change of residence
to No, 36 Bullers Lane.
Sources said only two MSD personnel had been
present near the front gate of the minister’s residence at the
time of the assassination. Sources said that according to
reports, the assassin had waited at the Thalaysingham residence
for about three to four days. They asked what the MSD had done
all that time. They said the army went only as an advance party.
Sources said that Mrs. Kadirgamar had earlier,
on several occasions complained to the Police about the duties
and functions of the MSD personnel.
"It is surprising why the CID is yet to question
Mrs. Kadirgamar, who was there with the late minister, when he
was shot by the LTTE. Why are they trying to cover up their
follies?" asked sources.
The CID had questioned over 25 Army Commandos
but not the only eyewitness, Mrs. Kadirgamar.
Sources revealed that they had seen a clear
pattern emerging from the Police investigations and their
questioning. That was that the police were trying to place the
blame on the Army. At one point an angry Commando had to walk
out because the CID had directly blamed the Army.
Sources revealed that the late minister had
spoken to IGP Chandra Fernando personally and asked for a report
on the LTTE men caught videoing his Bullers Lane residence three
weeks before he was killed. The IGP had sent the minister two
photos of the LTTE suspects with their personal details.
But no action had been taken apart from the
provision of this information, sources said.
Questions have also arisen over whether the NIB
was aware of the arrest of the LTTE spies and that the minister
had topped the LTTE hit list.