The big news last week was the stunning LTTE
attack on the Anuradhapura airbase which, despite some
half-baked efforts by some who should know better, was a major
setback for the country. While most impartial Lankans will agree
with the government's call to the opposition not to attempt to
gain political mileage at the expense of national effort to
subdue the Tigers militarily, the government itself has in
recent months played a game of accruing political capital for
itself by presenting the successes of the security forces as an
achievement under the belt of the administration with the
politicians, as usual, taking precedence over the armed forces.
Thus last week's admonition to the opposition which went on
record saying that as many as 18 aircraft had been destroyed
comes ill from those who first tried to make out that as few as
two aircraft had been lost.
Later in the week Prime Minister Ratnasiri
Wickremanayake, in a welcome parliamentary speech (spoiled by
two words calling what was undoubtedly a serious debacle a
"little mishap") came clean by itemizing the actual aircraft
losses. They added up to eight. But Wickremanayake was not as
forthcoming about the planes that had been damaged. Perhaps that
is where the difference between the government's figures and
those of the opposition lie. Our defence correspondent stays
with the UNP figure. The air force commander is now on record
that the cost of the aircraft that has been destroyed is USD 15
million but he has not said how many aircraft were totally
destroyed. It must be freely admitted that propaganda is very
much a part of war and the imperatives of sustaining morale
often necessitates economy with the truth. It is not only
governments that practice disinformation; the terrorists do
likewise. But today we live in an age where news travels at the
speed of sound and electronic images appear on television
screens worldwide within minutes of an incident. Thus the art of
Paul Joseph Goebbels cannot be practiced in the modern world in
the same manner as in Nazi Germany. The truth will finally out.
The reality is that the Sri Lanka Air Force has not lost its
strike capability but its surveillance ability appears to have
been blunted, more by the loss of the Beechcraft plane fitted
with sophisticated equipment rather than several 'drones' as the
unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are commonly described.
While security forces losses in terms of lives –
13 airmen including highly trained pilots were killed – and
aircraft were considerable, the LTTE too had to pay a very heavy
price to inflict this damage. Velupillai Prabhakaran is not
known to have previously thrown as many as 20 highly trained
suicide commandos into a single operation as he did at
Anuradhapura during the pre-dawn hours of Monday morning.
Obviously his desperation in the context of recent reverses was
such that he had to throw the cream of his fanatics into the
operation with the full knowledge that they were launched on a
one-way street. Prabhakaran has always been cavalier about lives
- whether they be those of his own cadres, the people he claims
to represent or innocent civilians who have been the victims of
his numerous terrorist attacks. Using human shields has been a
continuing strategy of his in the past and the future will be
doubtlessly no different. Yet he would not have easily dispensed
with the hard core he threw into Monday's attack without a
meticulous cost-benefit assessment. That operation was obviously
rated very high.
The UNP calling for the defence secretary's
resignation is no surprise. He is, after all, the president's
brother and very much within the opposition's political sights.
Neither the UNP nor its leaders would have expected Lt. Col. (Retd.)
Gotabhaya Rajapaksa to resign merely because they demanded it.
Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe has not resigned despite similar calls
following a string of election defeats and desertions from his
parliamentary group. The demand that the SLAF commander resigns
was less predictable. Did any service commander or their
political bosses resign during any previous watch due to
military debacles that have abounded in the course of this
long-drawn war, whoever was on the driving seat be it JRJ,
Premadasa or Kumaratunga? Undoubtedly the head of any
institution must assume eventual responsibility for ground
failures within their organizations. There is no need to labour
the point that Monday's event at Saliyapura was a major failure
in the area of base defence. What went wrong must be identified
by an investigation rather than a witch-hunt and necessary
remedial and preventive measures taken. As senior military
officers, both serving and retired, well know, there have too
often been instances of cover-ups in the past without
apportionment of responsibility and due punishment. The culprits
were allowed to escape unscathed and were in due course rewarded
with promotions and even diplomatic assignments post-retirement!
Who took the rap for July 1983, we would like to ask.
The display of the naked bodies of the LTTE dead
at Anuradhapura, though denied by the military spokesman,
appears to be a fact. The fact that there were three women among
the LTTE dead makes the situation much worse. The International
Committee of the Red Cross is on firm record saying that neither
the government nor the LTTE had asked that the bodies be
transferred as has been done on numerous previous occasions. The
fact that there was no transfer is not an issue. While it has to
be freely admitted that feelings must surely have been running
high in the forces following the attack, parading the dead in
the manner depicted by photographs claimed by the spokesman to
have been faked is totally unacceptable. The president ordering
an inquiry into this is a pointer to how this incident is being
viewed in the higher echelons of government.
There are many lessons to be learned from
Monday's events. Hopefully we have the capacity to learn from
the mistakes that have been made. Most importantly we must unite
across political and other differences for, as the prime
minister said in his speech in parliament, it is up to us to
decide whether "we should swim together or perish together."