
Amid indications of a further deepening of the
Middle East imbroglio comes the welcome news that steady moves
are afoot by the international community to firmly entrench the
development process in Afghanistan in answer to the
proliferating cancer of narco-terrorism.
Israeli airstrikes on the Gaza in retaliation
for Hamas rocket attacks on Israeli border settlements and
towns, could have the unfortunate effect of further trammelling
the US-sponsored Middle-East peace effort but the deployment of
what may be called the development weapon in Afghanistan, under
the aegis of the world community, could make a dent in the
compounded crisis Afghanistan has been laboriously shouldering
over the decades. The news is that the 24-member Joint
Coordinating and Monitoring Board, which was formed to oversee
the implementation of the Afghanistan Compact, launched in 2006,
has identified a series of development projects as urgently
needed by war-torn Afghanistan. Some of these are:
community-based development projects, expanded irrigation,
increasing use of livestock and the fostering of rural
entrepreneurship. Two parties in the Afghan development forum,
the World Bank and the Britain-based Department for
International Development, had reportedly estimated that the
world needs to invest more than US$2 billion in these
development projects if the Afghan farmer and sections of the
poor are to be weaned away from opium cultivation, which is a
booming business in Afghanistan and a number one income earner.
Opium
cultivation is also a mainstay of "terror" organisations which
siphon the huge income earned from the macabre enterprise for
the purchase of arms. Clearly, if the poor could be provided
with some alternative income sources they could be distracted
from the deadly lure of poppy cultivation and this is the
rationale behind the multi pronged development effort for
Afghanistan currently contemplated by the world community under
the Afghanistan Compact.
In the South and South-West Asian theatre, the
terror - hard drugs nexus is a fact of life but it is poverty
which strongly sustains it. Finding no viable form of
livelihood, the poor of Afghanistan are driven to opium
cultivation, inasmuch as the poor in other parts of the region
are tempted to try their hands at illegal livelihoods as a means
of surviving. Poverty also accounts for the seductive lure
militant faiths exercise over the more impressionable and
deprived South Asian minds. This could very well be happening in
the Pakistan "tribal belt", for instance, and in all other parts
of South Asia where religious bigotry holds sway.
Therefore, programmes to defuse "terror" in our
part of the world could be fundamentally deficient if this task
is narrowly conceived by governments as consisting of only armed
action to crush and eliminate terror outfits. There is much more
than meets the eye here. Poverty, hunger and deprivation drive
people to arms and bring them under the sway of divisive
ideologies. Programmes to eliminate economic inequity and all
other forms inequality could go a considerable distance in
ending violent dissension in Third World polities.
These lessons need to be borne in mind by all
those states in our region which are up against a "terror"
problem, no less than Afghanistan and the Middle East. For
example, Sri Lanka would do well to quickly follow-up the
neutralizing of its Eastern Province, militarily, with a
multidimensional development programme which would satisfy the
needs of all its peoples. It just would not do to only stabilize
and entrench state power in the province. Not only must a
development process take hold there, a political process must be
put in motion too where the truly deprived of the region would
be brought into the decision-making process. In the absence of
this two dimensional process, violent dissension would erupt
once again in the province.
The same considerations apply stringently to
Afghanistan. Taliban militancy is currently being held at bay
and it is quite some time since a presidential election was held
there. But the people are yet to be brought into the
decision-making process. Reports indicate that instead of a
democratic process being activated, the ruling elite is being
allowed to exercise exploitative and parasitic overlordship over
the weaker sections of Afghan society. Close kith and kin of the
current Afghan President are accused of engaging in the opium
trade.
Such socio-political blights in the Afghan
polity could set back the hands of time and bring the
development process to nought. The Third World could no longer
conceive ‘development’ only in terms of the upping of the GNP
per capita or as a top-down delivering of goods and services by
the all-powerful state. Development in the real sense is the
elimination of inequalities of all kinds and the incorporation
of the people in the country’s decision-making process.
pic
Anti-war demonstrators carry banners outside the British
Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s London residence of 10 Downing
Street, Wednesday, Feb. 6, 2008, to protest the visit of U.S.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Rice was holding meetings
in Britain Wednesday on Afghanistan strategy. (AP)