Between the Lines
By Kuldip Nayar

A Pakistani woman arrives
to cast her vote at a polling station covering with election
posters of various candidates for country's parliamentary
election in Rawalpindi, Pakistan on Monday, Feb. 18, 2008. (AP)
PAKISTAN is not a failed state. It is an
uncertain state which can take any course-theocratic, despotic,
semi-democratic or just chaotic. When I visited Karachi and
Lahore a few days ago, I found hardly anyone who was optimist
about Pakistan's future. However, the country is not falling
apart as is the general impression. Different forces-religious,
political and criminal-are competing among themselves for more
space. In the short run, they are heightening fears and in the
long run they are threatening the country's integration.
Ultimately, the confrontation may well be between the political
forces and the extremists. The nation's fate depends on the
outcome. The late Benazir Bhutto, who has become taller than her
executed father Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, has tuned out to be
prophetic. Her hand-written testament says: "She feared for
Pakistan's future in the face of extremism and dictatorship."
Indeed, the extremists are present all over the country,
including Lahore, Karachi and Islamabad. But they have not
affected the day-to-day life.
A bomb blast here or a stray killing there is a
daily occurrence. But this is no longer a handiwork of the
Afghan Taliban who seems to observe a ceasefire after
Islamabad's undertaking not to disturb them from Waziristan and
the parts of Swat Valley they occupy. The real culprits are the
Pakistan Taliban, the creation of successive governments which
at one time dreamt of having Afghanistan as their satellite to
get the much-wanted "strategic depth." They still have the
support of the ISI and the 35 per cent of the army men who are
reportedly jehadis. It has been reported that some of them did
not fire in the midst of hostilities in Waziristan at the
Taliban on the consideration that they were Muslims.
The kidnapping of the Pakistan envoy near
Peshawar may not have been done by the Afghan Taliban. It may be
a plot by the Pakistan Taliban to show their clout. My feeling
is that the Pakistan Taliban spreading from the NWFP to other
parts of the country is a real danger to the nation. They are
the extremists, the product of madrassas where they have been
brainwashed. They look longingly at the Hisbul and other
extremist organizations which were once a terror. What is
frightening is that they, with an appeal to religious
sentiments, are gaining ground. There is none among the
politicians to challenge them openly because of the fear of
mullah or maulvi who can denounce them at mosques. "We are
reaping what we have sown," is the oft-repeated observation.
This refers to the calculated efforts made first by the late
General Zia-ul Haq and then President General Pervez Musharraf
to "Islamise" Pakistan and to encourage the extremists so as to
stall the liberals and still their cry for democracy.
Unlike the extremists who have a strain of
understanding running throughout their organizations,
politicians are a divided lot. They are fighting among
themselves. True, all of them are fiercely agitating for the
removal of Musharraf who stops at nothing to hurt or even
eliminate them. But what they lack is the unity of purpose.
The mere phrase, democracy, cannot bring
coherence. They seldom meet and do not ever discuss the strategy
to retrieve the country from the military rule. Their egos and
claims verge on the point of arrogance. They would rather accept
Musharraf than anyone from among them to lead. They hold their
durbar, a feudal relic which Pakistan proudly retains. At the
durbar, they pontificate about democracy and equality before an
array of psychopaths and retainers. Feudalism is still too
deeply entrenched in the country to allow the idea of equality
to germinate.
The common man, groaning under the burden of
rising prices and lessening incomes, is a confused and
disillusioned spectator. That is the reason why he does not come
out on the streets. He does not see anything for himself in what
is going on except a change in masters. Religion may be opium
but it gives him the promise of "a better tomorrow" than today.
He too wants Musharraf to step down, not because he is a
dictator but because he has not improved his lot. Again, the
military has little to relieve him from his greatest
predicament: how does he send his children to school and at the
same time sustain his family? It is not that he does not get
angry but he tends to be sectarian in expression because that is
how he has been brought up in the atmosphere that has prevailed
in Pakistan. There is a great divide. I was not surprised to
find the people at Sind Club in Karachi singing the praises of
Musharraf.
Yet, it was the common man who went wild in Sind
in the wake of Benazir Bhutto's assassination. Railway stations
were set on fire, costing the exchequer roughly $20 billion.
Shops were looted and even police stations were attacked. There
was no law but only disorder for three days. Asif Ali Zaradari,
Benazir Bhutto's husband and the interim president of the
Pakistan People's Party (PPP), the largest in the country,
justified violence as natural fallout of people's anger over the
assassination of their leader. It was like what Rajiv Gandhi
said when 3,000 Sikhs were killed in Delhi in the Indira
Gandhi's murder: When a big tree falls, the earth is bound to
shake. The vacuum that Benazir Bhutto's killing has created is
hard to fill. The unity of thought can do so. The PPP can
provide an alternative. A person like Aitzaz Hasan, who is under
house arrest, can lead the party to implement its ethos of a
left-of-the-centre society, with pluralism as its base. He is
also acceptable to Nawaz Sharif, leader of the second largest
party, Muslim League (N). Aitzaz led the lawyers' agitation to
have Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry reinstated. The
challenge to Aitzaz is Zaradari who would like to be the prime
minister. Post-election scenario is not a happy one. The rigging
appears inevitable and may arouse the people's wrath. Political
parties are not in a position to check it. Neither Nawaz Sharif,
nor Zaradari has the base which can quell the disorder if it
engulfs the country. I could see the gathering of a storm during
my trip. The anger over Pakistan's deficiencies is at present
focused on Musharraf. He may step down if and when General
Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, Chief of the Army Staff, taps his shoulder
and tells him to go. This happened when General Yahya Khan asked
General Ayub Khan, then at the helm of affairs, to quit. In that
case, Pakistan will be back to square one and even the semblance
of democracy may go. But this time, the army rule may not go
unchallenged. The public has had enough of it.