So Matt Prior doesn't like the way he is
portrayed. ""When I've read the character assassinations, I've
phoned my family and asked, 'Is this really me?'" squeaked the
Sussex keeper, who is out of favour with England at the moment.
He isn't the first and definitely won't be the
last to be, apparently, misunderstood.
IAN HEALY: Former Aussie keeper and Channel
Nine commentator Ian Healy said he was the victim of a
misunderstanding when viewers complained that he mocked breast
cancer research last week.
Not known for his shy and retiring nature on the
pitch, "Heals" was caught on camera miming a violin when Andrew
Symonds was talking about fund-raising during a break in the
cricket.
Soon afterwards, emails circulated around Sydney
that Healy had resigned, a rumour that was ultimately untrue.
Healy claimed he was having a dig at Symonds,
who along with Matthew Hayden, has been using pink bat handles
this summer in a deal with their sponsor to raise money and
promote awareness.
"I think people perceived that I was mocking
breast cancer research, but I was mocking Andrew, who was
promoting a scheme he has had going all summer with [bat-maker]
Gray-Nicholls," he told smh.com.au.
INZAMAM UL-HAQ: Former Pakistan captain
Inzamam-ul-Haq attacked an official report that described him as
a "dictator" and blamed him for the team's disastrous showing at
the 2007 World Cup.
The investigation was undertaken by the
Performance Evaluation Committee (PEC) of the Pakistan Cricket
Board (PCB. It concluded that Inzamam's attitude was "haughty
and that of a dictator" and said he should have been removed as
captain before the World Cup.
"I was blamed for being very lenient during my
whole captaincy career and now I have turned into a dictator,"
Inzamam said. "That could only be accepted if players had
complained that I acted like one."
"This is nothing new in Pakistan cricket. When
the team loses, all the blame is put on others", he said
wearily.
He said the presence of Salim Altaf and
Salahuddin Ahmed, both paid employees of the PCB, on the report
committee undermined its conclusions.
As if to prove Inzamam's point, new skipper
Shoaib Malik has got nothing but flak after losing two Test
series in a row, with even his own team mates claiming he is
too...... soft.
SREESANTH: Another of life's shrinking
violets (not), Sreesanth said he did not intend the beamer that
almost decapitated Kevin Pietersen at Trent Bridge last summer.
"Nothing is more dear to me than the game itself
and I swear by this game that I was attempting a yorker but my
wrist position went horribly wrong and it went as a beamer."
Despite his protestations to the contrary, the
fast bowler's apparent disrespect of the opposition has irked
Australia, England and a few respected commentators too.
"An apology doesn't necessarily mean it is
sincere", suggested Mike Atherton. "With match referees on the
prowl, any bowler with an ounce of survival instinct is bound to
apologise, deliberately bowled or not."
SHOAIB AKHTAR: Calling Pakistan fast bowler
Shoaib Akhtar a "jolly" person, former captain Zaheer Abbas
suggested the bowler has been misunderstood, and should be
handled with care.
Zaheer said he never found Shoaib any more
problematic than his other team-mates during his stint as team
manager on the 2006 tour of England.
"During my time as (Pakistan team) manager,
Shoaib came across as a jolly, friendly guy, which is why it is
a bit hard for me to comprehend the sort of controversies he has
generated and still generates," Zaheer said..
"But I believe you have to teach players to be
disciplined from a young age, and it is difficult to change a
person when he is in the twilight years of his career."
Zaheer said Pakistan cricket's history is full
of players with "poor disciplinary records" although it is
unknown how many of those hit team mates with bats.
MUNAF PATEL: When Munaf Patel was left out
of India's World Twenty20 team and dropped from the one-day
squad, he portrayed himself as a sensitive soul disturbed by
wrongful accusations.
Munaf said that he was reticent by nature and
that this shouldn't be read as a lack of ambition. "What is this
intensity? Talk to me, try to understand me ... The problem with
me is that I speak very less. I speak only when I want to, and
when I feel the need to. But what I say is straight from the
heart. That's how I grew up in my village. Let somebody tell me
to my face that my attitude is not right."
Now why didn't David Gower say that when he
hooked to long leg in the last over before lunch at Adelaide in
1991? Probably because if looks could have killed, Graham Gooch
would have.
SOURAV GANGULY: "I saw that zeal among the
players when the Indians were led by the Prince of Kolkata",
notes Geoff Boycott in the foreword to the book Sourav Ganguly -
the Maharajah of Cricket.
"He's a natural leader of men who led by
instinct", adds the former England player. Would this be the
same player accused by Andrew Flintoff of acting like Royalty?
The man who refused to carry drinks on his first tour of
Australia or got Kapil Dev to carry his kit bag?
Of course, the media, including us, have always
overplayed more negative aspects of Ganguly's stubborn
character, which is generally dignified despite difficult times
on and off the pitch.
Like Boycott, he remains admired but not
universally loved.
DOUGLAS JARDINE: He may have been the
instigator of the most controversial and intimidating bowling
tactics ever devised, but the Bodyline series of 1932/33 did not
tell the whole truth about the sort of man Jardine was.
He was shy and dedicated to his family and had a
terrific sense of humour among company. Unfortunately, his
legacy is not a good one. He was described as "a man of
character who, like all men of character, was not liked by
everybody. He did what he set out to do, as when his side won
The Ashes in Australia in 1932-33, even if the method he adopted
did not meet with general approval."
(cricket365.com)