Ahmadinejad in Iraq: Towards
normalization?
By By DR.ABDUL RUFF Colachal
Leading a large delegation that included his
Foreign Minister Mottaki, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad arrived
for two days on 02 February in Baghdad, a nation that was once
Iran's bitter enemy. Iran and Iraq are both led by Shiite
Muslims, though Iraq has more Sunnis than Iran. The two
countries were hostile to each other and fought a long and
destructive war during most of the 1980s, in part because of the
border dispute, with the weapons purchased from USA and USSR,
killing an estimated one million people. After murdering Saddam
and overthrowing his regime, USA has established a Shite regime
in Iraq by keeping puppets in power. It would take years for
them to come to term with the reality and improve relations in
real sense between them. Obviously encouraged indirectly by the
occupying USA, Iran and Iraq have already begun talks on trade,
energy cooperation and a long-running border row, though the two
neighbours have yet to sign a peace treaty.
Ahmadinejad is the first Iranian president to
visit Iraq. The Iranian leader went from Baghdad's airport to a
meeting with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, a Sunni Kurd
speaking fluent Farsi, who gave him a red-carpet welcome. Iraqi
President Jalal Talabani welcomed Ahmadinejad with a guard of
honor, as a military band played the national anthems of both
nations. Talabani, who grinned broadly and eagerly shook
Ahmadinejad's hand, called the visit "historic." Talabani's
headquarters are located right across the Tigris River from the
mammoth new U.S. Embassy in the fortified Green Zone, an area
that has been repeatedly hit by mortar attacks, with the U.S.
blaming Shiite militants. Apart from Iraqi President Talabani
and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki-- both of whom have visited
Iran since taking office --Ahmadinejad also met with and Deputy
Prime Minister Barham Saleh. After meeting with Ahmadinejad, al-Maliki
said the visit was "an expression of the strong desire of
enhancing relations and developing mutual interests after the
past tension during the dictatorship era." Talabani called
Ahmadinejad's visit "historic. The tone among Ahmadinejad and
his Iraqi hosts was more than cordial. Ahmadinejad said talks on
02 March with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, a Sunni Kurd who
told the Iranian leader to call him "Uncle Jalal," were
"brotherly."
President Mahmoud said his landmark visit to
Iraq opened a new chapter in "brotherly" relations between the
two countries, which were once bitter enemies. He said Iran
wants to reopen the historical ties between these "brotherly"
nations. The Iranian president said he was "truly happy" to be
visiting an Iraq "without the dictator" Saddam Hussein. He said
the people of Iraq were going through "tough" time. "It is
friendly to all groups in Iraq. Isn't it ridiculous that those
who have deployed 160,000 troops in Iraq accuse us of
intervening there?" Ahmadinejad is quoted as saying. He sought
to reassure Iraqis ahead of the trip that Iran is not fueling
violence in Iraq. Iran has no need to intervene in Iraq. ".. the
Iraqi people will overcome the situation and the Iraq of
tomorrow will be a powerful, developed and unique Iraq," a
smiling Ahmadinejad said. "A united, powerful and developed Iraq
is in the interests of all countries of the region," he said.
While Iraq is largely Arab, Iran is mainly
Persian. Iranian President hailed Iran and Iraq as world leaders
in "justice and morality". Ahmadinejad’s two-day trip
illustrated one of the unintended consequences of the 2003
U.S.-led invasion. "We believe that the major powers who have
come to the region from thousands of kilometers away should
respect the will of nations and leave this region. That's the
best service they can offer these nations," the Iranian leader
told reporters after meeting with Iraq's president. Iranian
president said that six years ago there were none of these
terrorists. When the others stepped foot in this country and
region we find a foothold for the terrorists, referring to the
U.S.-led invasion of Iraqi in 2003… Nations are dissatisfied
with the rules that now dominate the world. They want justice.
The nations of Iran and Iraq are front-runners in establishing
justice, morality, kindness," he said in comments carried by
Iranian state television.
The visit has given Ahmadinejad a chance to
highlight the improved relationship his nation has with
post-Saddam Hussein Iraq while also serving as an act of
defiance toward the U.S., which accuses Iran of aiding Shiite
extremists in Iraq. The Iran-brokered "truce" between the two
Shiite heavyweights in Iraqi politics, the Mahdi Army and the
Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council (SIIC), is now history to prevent
the shedding of Shiite blood back in August 2007. Iraqi prime
minister told Ahmadinejad that Iran had "helped enormously with
security and stability in Iraq". Iran is also helping Iraq to
reduce its chronic shortage of electricity, with new
transmission lines to the Iraqi national grid from power
stations in Iran. Now Al Maliki wants to regain a majority in
Parliament the Shiite bloc of Sadr and SIIC that would make Al
Maliki's supporters a total of 156, re-gaining a majority. The
man to thank for all of this is Ahmadinejad.
Addressing a news-conference, Ahmadinejad said:
"We have had good talks in a friendly and construction
environment. We have the same understanding of things and the
two parties are determined to strengthen their political,
economic and cultural co-operation. We have had good talks in a
friendly and constructive environment. We have the same
understanding of things and the two parties are determined to
strengthen their political, economic and cultural co-operation."
The news conference appeared to end abruptly after a reporter
asked Ahmadinejad about the People's Mujahedeen Organization of
Iran, which was allied with Saddam during the bitter 1980s war
between the two countries. The group has opposed Iran's Islamic
republic and has operated out of Iraq. The U.S. and European
Union list it as a terrorist organization. Talabani interjected,
saying: "This issue has been discussed earlier and the presence
of those as a terrorist organization is constitutionally not
allowed. We will endeavor to get rid of them out of the Iraqi
territory soon."
The Iranians are worried that sometime in the
near future, they might lose their Hezbollah ally in Lebanon.
All countries that have a significant Shiite population, like
Saudi Arabia or Bahrain, are off-limits for the Iranians because
they would be too difficult to penetrate. Iran thinks Iraq is
ripe, however, for another Hezbollah. This visit creates
background for the future course in that direction. In mainly
Sunni Arab Falluja west of Baghdad, protesters marched through
the city waving banners saying "Get your non-Arab hands off
Iraq". In the holy city of Najaf, historically the centre of
Shi'ite learning, Ahmadinejad's trip was welcomed. Ahmadinejad,
a Shiite himself, visited the shrine of Imam Mouse al-Kati
around midnight. He travelled in a motorcade under tight
security through Baghdad's streets to the shrine in the northern
Kazimiyah district.
AN OBSERVATION
The first visit by an Iranian president since
the 1979 Islamic revolution aimed to boost business, political
and cultural ties with its immediate neigbor Iraaq, now under
occupation by US-led forces. According to Iraqileaders, the
visit benefits the nation of Iraq as it strengthens the
relations between the two countries. Iraqi officials said up to
10 bilateral accords would be signed soon on behalf of the
ministries of transport, including railways and freight and sea
transport. Today trade between them is brisk. Iran on March 01
announced that it would export 200 megawatts of power to its
neighbor Iraq from next week. Speaking to reporters here, Iran’s
Energy Minister Parviz Fattah said power exports would be
possible after connection of power networks in Iran's western
city of Abadan to Iraqi city of Basra. Millions of Iranian
pilgrims travel to major Shiite shrines in Iraq, and Iran is
building a major airport for pilgrims to fly to Shiite shrines
in Najaf and Karbala.
The visit is a strong show of support for the
Shia-dominated government in Baghdad. he hoped it would decrease
tension between the two countries. His visit sends a clear
message to Iraqis that the Iranian influence in the country is
significant and enduring. Iran wants to be seen to be playing a
positive role in Iraq, which the United States can ill afford to
isolate or ignore and Ahmadinejad made it clear he believes
Iranian and Iraqi stability are mutually dependent. His trip was
as much about symbolism as it will be about cementing economic
and political ties between Iran and Baghdad's Shia-led
government as well as an attempt to improve the security
situation in Iraq. The trip is also a strong show of support by
Tehran for the Shiite-dominated government of Prime Minister
Nora al-Maliki.
A vehement U.S. critic, Ahmadinejad's visit to
Shiite-majority Iraq is set to underline Western concerns about
Iranian influence in the region that Washington alleges extends
to aiding militants in Iraq and also destabilizing Lebanon. It
not only highlights his country's growing influence on its Arab
neighbor in the post-Saddam Hussein era, but it also serves as
an act of defiance toward the U.S. It will be closely watched by
the US that refuses to vacate Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraqi
officials have urged Washington and Tehran, which have not had
diplomatic ties for almost three decades, not to use Iraq as a
proxy battleground to fight out their differences, which include
a row over Iran's nuclear ambitions. Iran also has ample
instability to contend with already - to the east, across the
border in Afghanistan. There has been a lot of symbolism during
this visit, and not a lot of substance. But at the same time, he
doesn't want to threaten the Iraqis or Gulf States who fear that
Iraq will be an Iranian satellite.
Ahmadinejad also should be trying to use his
historic Iraqi visit to bolster his support back home. His
performances in and out of Iran are seen as referendum on the
Iranian president, who has come under criticism from all sides
in his country for spending too much time on anti-Western
rhetoric and not enough on economic problems plaguing the
country. The Iranian president may welcome a foreign policy
success to distract attention from the economy and double-digit
inflation before a March parliamentary election that will test
his popularity and indicate his chance for re-election in 2009.
However, what matters for Iran is that all
indicators point to the seriousness of an upcoming US offensive
on Tehran, although the UNSC sanctions against have been shelved
for the time being at the instance of Russia and China. The US
game-pan in West Asia has always worried the nations there. As
it is known, Afghanistan and Iraq continue to reel and pose
threat to US supremacy. US president Bush seems to consider now,
after ignoring it for too long, the advice of a section of
Washington based strategists to go for rapprochement with Iran
and Syria in order to solve the Iraqi explosive situation and
shift the military equipment to Afghanistan to concentrate on
Muslims fighting the invaders there. This offers credence to the
belief that US is encouraging Iran-Iraq rapprochement, though
they have not shelved invasion of Iran.
Israel's continuous genocides on the innocent
Palestinians have not been blocked or restrained by the
"helpless" Arab world, divided over the issue of the so-called
national interests. Israel's close friends don't seem to
dissuade Tel-Aviv from illegal agressions. It is only the
Iranian president who slams the US-Israeli joint terrorism
unleashed on Palestinians. He is right when he says problems in
the region would get more complicated if the imperialist powers
continue to stay in the region on any pretext. Iran’s role in
the Middle East Peace becomes all the more important because it
seems only firmness could make the Israeli leadership to resolve
the crisis permanently. Arab world could only ill-afford to
discourage Iran’s legitimate future role in region. However, the
strategic role being played by the USA in any new development in
the region has to be kept in mind. So long as US-led forces stay
in Iraq and in the region it is difficult for Iraq to conclude
any strong relationship with Iran or any other Islamic nation in
the region.