 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Apology for oral
history The story is a significant one and ought to be included in our oral history, later to be incorporated in the corpus of the written history of that period, but unfortunately as the writer says there is no double check on that story. Another significant story, very widely current but not properly authenticated as far as I know, is supposed to show Sir John’s acumen in assessing character. J. R. Jayewardene was going away after attending ... |
