MiG deal implicated UKRINMASH co-sponsors Colombo Defence Seminar 2018



article_image

The UKRINMASH stall at last year’s (2017)0 Colombo Defence Seminar

by C.A.Chandraprema


The Colombo Defence Seminar 2018 commenced in Colombo last Thursday. The theme for this year was ‘Security in an Era of Global Disruptions’ The Keynote speech was delivered by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe. If this Seminar featured in the news, it would mainly be due to the comments made by the Prime Minister about the technology driven new media being a non-traditional threat to security. He specifically mentioned social media such as Facebook and Twitter and other websites as the new media that has become a global disruptive force and he stated "We have seen the potential of this new media to destabilize nations and to effect serious changes in the case of countries like Tunisia and Egypt".


Most people in this country who still remember what happened in the run up to the 2015 presidential elections will no doubt be appalled at the Prime Minister’s volte face. Social media like Facebook and Twitter have many uses and is, therefore, a valuable addition to communications. But what gets shared most and has the likelihood of reaching the most number of people through platforms like Facebook and Twitter is more often than not, salacious gossip, hate messages and the like. In other words, it’s mostly the negative side of things that goes viral on these social media even though they can be used to spread positive messages too. But positive messages have no chance against the negative stuff when it comes to grabbing the attention of the public.   


In a way that is perhaps common to all the media and is bound up with mass psychology. The yahapalana cabal that came together in 2009 just before the 2010 presidential elections remained one united force till the 2015 presidential elections and during that time, there was a relentless campaign of vilification against the Rajapaksa government. Facebook came on the scene only in February 2004 and Twitter in March 2006. Thus, the Rajapksa era which began in November 2005 coincided with the birth and spread of this new media. During the nine years of the Rajapaksa era, the per capita GDP also increased threefold and new geegaws like smartphones appeared on the scene and spread like wildfire. Computer usage also increased exponentially. At that time nobody knew the impact, negative or positive, that this new technology and new media would have on the public. Thus as fate would have it, the forces arraigned against the Rajapaksas had full use of this new medium of communication which could be used for propaganda purposes when it was new and its destructive power was at its height. Thus the most creative and forward looking government we have had since independence was buried under an avalanche of falsehoods and hate.


 In the immediate aftermath of the January 2015 overthrow of the Rajapaksa government, the cabal that assumed power was effusive in their thanks to the various websites and the ‘social media activists’ who made that victory possible. Chandrika Kumaratunga thanked some yahapalana websites by name. Today, one would say that the public and even the youth are more mature and used to the new media so its destructive power has waned marginally. It is a rich irony indeed to see the very beneficiaries of the social media now calling it a ‘destructive force’ and even mentioning Tunisia and Egypt as countries that had been destroyed by the new media. Earlier, the foreign patrons of the yahapalana government were hailing what happened in Tunisia and Egypt as the ‘Arab Spring’ which brought democracy to the Arab world.


It may be pertinent to say that it is not just Tunisia and Egypt that fell victim to the destructive power of Facebook but also Sri Lanka. Now having used (or abused) Facebook by using organized groups of activists to make propaganda posts, and to spread complete falsehoods against their political opponents, this government now considers the same media to be a threat and even hosts international seminars to discuss how the threat can be contained. For the first time since the appearance of this new media in Sri Lanka, it was this government that imposed blocks on the social media on the pretext that it was to stop communal violence from spreading in Kandy. Now that it had been tried out and found to be at least partially effective despite the availability of numerous ways to bypass the block through proxies, any government can use the same means to stifle or at least reduce criticism of itself.


The surprising appearance
of UKRINMASH


Even though it was the Prime Minister’s comments on the social media made during the keynote address of the Colombo Defence Seminar, that gained the most publicity, the important thing about this international seminar was that one of its co-sponsors was UKRINMASH the Ukrainian arms supplier. If Colombo Defence Seminar 2018 had been held under the Rajapaksa government, there would have been no issue at all in UKRINMASH co-sponsoring anything. However under the yahapalana government UKRINMASH has been one of the most maligned, vilified and investigated foreign companies and even at this moment it features prominently in the investigation into the 2006 MiG deal which was one of the first cases to be taken up by the FCID set up by the present government to probe the financial transactions of the previous government. Quite apart from UKRINMASH being implicated in one of the most high profile criminal investigations, it has also been at the centre of what is undoubtedly the longest standing unresolved corruption allegation in Sri Lanka’s history.


 The 2006 purchase of four MiG-27 planes and the overhauling of four other MiG aircraft by UKRINMASH have been dogged by accusations of corruption from the very beginning and the controversy is now 12 years old. The present government has been investigating this transaction for more than three years and up to now, no wrongdoing in relation to the transaction has yet been established. The FCID has been hot on the heels of Udayanga Weeratunga, the former Sri Lankan Ambassador to Russia, who is alleged to have been involved in this transaction and there is a separate sideshow going on with regard to that, with a procession of high officials of the FCID and the Attorney General’s department going to Dubai to get Udayanga Weeratunga extradited but all that is for the purpose of the purported investigation – not because it has been conclusively established that Weeratunga was involved in any kind of wrongdoing with regard to the matter under investigation.


 Even though UKRINMASH figures prominently in the police investigation of more than three years into the MiG transaction, it is certainly true that no wrongdoing has been established with regard to UKRINMASH either, and legally speaking, there is no bar to that company sponsoring any event in Sri Lanka or even maintaining a commercial presence here. However, it will certainly come as a surprise to many members of the public that this company which is routinely dragged through the mud by the present government, could be at the same time sponsoring events which has the participation of the Prime Minister and would have had the participation of the President as well if he had not been overseas. Quite apart from what the police have been reporting to courts for more than three years now, the press has been saying some pretty nasty things about UKRINMASH over the years.


For example one of the first newspaper reports to appear about UKRINMASH was in the Sunday Times of December, 2006, under the title "Big fraud and billion-rupee scandal in latest MiG deal". Among the allegations made in this article were the following:


= The contract for the supply of four MiG-27s and the overhauling of four other MiG aircraft was touted as a government to government deal between the Sri Lanka Air Force and the Ukranian Government-owned firm Ukrinmarsh. However, the contract signed on July 26, 2006, identifies an offshore company, Bellimissa Holdings Limited registered in the United Kingdom, as the Designated Party to which the entire payment including the freight cost would go. (Since UKRINMASH was responsible for designating Belimissa Holdings as the party that was to receive the payment on its behalf, it is guilty of misleading everybody by touting this transaction as a government to government deal while it was actually being transacted through suspicious third parties. Only UKRINMASH could have directed that the payment due to them should be paid to a third party.)


= The MiG-27s in question were left over from a fleet from which the Sri Lanka Air Force carefully selected and purchased seven units in 2000. (Thus UKRINMASH was responsible for palming off leftovers even on a regular customer.)


= The first four MiG-27s bought in 2000 was for US $ 1.75 million each. The other two bought the same year were for US $1.6 million each. A MiG-23 UB trainer was also procured for US $ 900,000 in 2000.  However the purchase price of each of the four MiG-27s bought in 2006 cost US$ 2,462,000 each. (Since only the seller can fix prices, UKRINMASH is responsible for unethically jacking up prices in a situation where the goods sold by them in 2006 were exactly the same as the goods sold in 2000.)  


=  "…the Ukranian Government was unable to come up with a finance package to sell their aircraft that have been lying on the ground for six years. Bellimissa Holdings Ltd., The Sunday Times learnt, is a private company where some Cabinet Ministers in Ukraine are known to have a stake." (Thus UKRINMASH belongs to a country with a corrupt government.)


= Two of these aircraft were offered to the Air Force by D.S. Alliance Private Limited in May 2000 at a cost of US$ 1.75 million each. The Air Force did not deem it fit to obtain them. But they are now being purchased at a cost of US $ 2,462,000 or by paying a further US$ 712,000 according to documents in possession of The Sunday Times. (Thus UKRINMASH has the rapacious attitude of mind of a used car salesman.)


= The fee for the overhaul of the MiG-23 UB trainer, according to the contract, is US$ 1.1 million… the cost at which the Air Force purchased this trainer in October 2000 was only US$ 900,000. (Yet another instance where UKRINMASH has displayed a profiteering mentality – by charging more for the overhaul than for the original cost of the plane that they themselves supplied to Sri Lanka through their Singapore based agent D.S.Alliance in 2000.)


Selling MiG-27s to a husband and wife dealership


That was how the bad press about UKRINMASH started. (This is of course not to find fault with any newspaper that published such details. All newspapers can present to the public only the details it possesses. If the details in hand seem to point to something that does not look right, then the newspaper publishes it. Those who have details to disprove the newspaper story can then present whatever facts they have. But this process does tend to leave some bruised faces and black eyes around and UKRINMASH has two black eyes and bruises from head to foot as far as Sri Lanka is concerned.) Twelve long years later, there was still no improvement in the kind of press coverage that UKRINMASH was getting in Sri Lanka. For example, the Sunday Times in an article titled "Multimillion dollar MiG deal: Focus on fake contract but real story emerges" dated March 18, 2018 had the following to say about UKRINMASH:


"On a bitterly chilly wintry morning in the Ukranian capital of Kiev last year, an investigation team from the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) sat down to a conference with officials. Present were the country’s Prosecutor General and top officials of Ukrinmarsh, the state agency that exports military products and related equipment. The FCID team leader, Senior DIG Ravi Waidyalankara, who is the head of the FCID, asked a senior official of Ukrinmarsh about the sale to Sri Lanka of MiG 27 fighter jets and a trainer to the Sri Lanka Air Force. "What sale?" he asked and exhorted "there has been no sale of any MiG-27 aircraft to Sri Lanka from us. There never was." …Not only did Ukrinmarsh deny selling any MiG 27s to the SLAF at anytime, but the FCID investigations have now revealed that they did so to Bellimissa Holdings Ltd."  


The implication of this is that if any country does business with UKRINMASH, years later, the Ukrainian government is likely to claim that there was never any contract between the two parties. When a government owned entity in one country transacts business with a government owned entity in a foreign country, there should be a cast iron guarantee that the latter country will acknowledge and stand by the contract. Is Ukraine a banana republic where even a government owned entity in that country can have bogus contracts with government owned entities in other sovereign states? Given the manner in which the Ukrainian authorities have reacted to the Sri Lankan investigation it will be extremely risky for any country to buy anything from any Ukrainian government owned entity because they can claim not to have sold anything to that party. The Sunday Times article of March 18, 2018 said that UKRINMASH had not sold any planes to the Sri Lanka Air Force in 2006 but had sold them instead to D.S.Alliance of Singapore. But D.S.Alliance does not use MiG-27s. When they sold the planes, to whom did UKRINMASH issue the End User Certificates for those planes? The Ukrainian authroties don’t seem to have said anything about that. So that makes UKRINMASH a company that should in reality be internationally blacklisted.


According to the police investigation in Sri Lanka, UKRINMASH had sold four MiG-27 planes to a husband and wife dealership in Singapore and they had fully overhauled four more MiG aircraft that had been sent to Ukraine by the same Singaporean husband and wife without knowing who owns those planes or where they were going to after the overhaul. If such was indeed the case, the American Embassy in Colombo should have informed Donald Trump about what UKRINMASH was up to. Any terrorist outfit or rogue state in the world can gain access to sophisticated military hardware from UKRINMASH through the Singaporean husband and wife dealership. If the Sri Lankan police investigation has got it right, then Ukraine should be under UN sanctions. Yet here UKRINMASH is, in Colombo co-sponsoring a Defence Seminar!


That is just a sample of the kind of press coverage that UKRINMASH has been getting in Sri Lanka over the past 12 years or more. The above are allegations that appeared only in one newspaper 12 years apart. The present writer does not agree with the allegations made and has published a contrary view in this newspaper. But that does not take away the fact that UKRINMASH has been getting a lot of bad press in Sri Lanka. In April this year, the ‘Police Correspondent’ of the Economynext website said in a post titled "Sri Lanka’s MiG probe extends to Singapore, Australia", that the probe into the MiG deal in which UKRINMASH was implicated was to be extended to Singapore and Australia as police listed charges against four foreigners.


The four foreigners to be named as suspects in the case are D.A.Peregudov, the then Director (Chief Executive Officer) of UKRINMASH, M. I. Kuldyrkaev who had signed the contract on behalf of Bellimissa Holdings, the party designated by UKRINMASH to receive the payment, and T.S.Lee and his wife Ng Lay Khim, directors of D. S. Alliance, a regular agent of UKRINMASH who had sold the first seven MiG planes to Sri lanka in 2000. So anybody even remotely connected to UKRINMASH in the past are now to be considered ‘suspects’ in an ongoing police investigation  in Sri Lanka. Yet UKRINMASH sponsors the Colombo Defence Seminar and the Prime Minister delivers the keynote speech at this seminar co-sponsored by a company that has figured prominently in an ongoing investigation initiated by his own government.


The investigation into the MiG transaction has been carried out for more than three years by the FCID which is a police unit directly controlled by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe and a  Sub-Committee comprising of Ministers Mangala Samaraweera, Malik Samarawickrema, Patali Champika Ranawaka, and Rauff Hakeem, parliamentarians Anura Kumara Dissanayake, R. Sampanthan, M. A. Sumanthiran and Democratic Party Leader Sarath Fonseka along with President’s Counsel Dr. Jayampathy Wickramaratne and NGO activist J.C.Weliamuna.


The Urgent Response Committee of the above committee which has the status of a Cabinet Sub-Committee was headed by JVP leader MP Anura Kumara Dissanayake. This was a committee consisting of public officials, police officers, lawyers, financial specialists and officials of the Criminal Investigation Department. The MiG transaction was one of the earliest cases directed by this Committee to the FCID.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
animated gif
Processing Request
Please Wait...